My One Question
What would you ask? If you could ask only one question of the candidates for the presidency of the United States what would it be?
Tonight we will see the spectacle of the first presidential debates among the candidates of the Republican Party. Several television and newspaper pundits are suggesting the questions that “must be asked by” the moderator. For example, Tom Friedman suggests candidates be asked about an increase in the gasoline tax to pay for our crumbling highway infrastructure. He notes this is something that Ronald Reagan supported upon his election and might help determine which candidates would be able to lead beyond narrow ideological constraints. (See: http://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/05/opinion/thomas-friedman-my-question-for-the-republican-presidential-debate.html?src=me&_r=0). Friedman also suggests questions on immigration and carbon tax credits. Good questions — just not my question.
There is another group called Circle of Protection that would ask the candidates what they would do to end hunger and poverty in our nation. Several of the candidates, in both parties, have posted video responses to this excellent question (see: circleofprotection.us). This too is a marvelous question — a truly important question. The video responses by candidates that have already been made are helpful — revealing of core beliefs.
However, most of the questions suggested by the pundits are designed to elicit a provocative response, something that will pit one candidate against another. Most of the suggested questions have little to do with policy or vision and much to do with demeaning another candidate. Clearly, the hope is to start a political food fight! Most of the suggested quarries by the television talking-heads are designed to generate more heat than light. These suggestions are a version of the old school yard taunt “Lets you and him fight!” How interesting that on August 6th, Hiroshima Day, our nation’s attention turns to a forum where many are hoping to see a fight.
My one question would be this: WHO IS MY NEIGHBOR?
It comes from my enduring preoccupation with the Gospel parable we often refer to as the story of the Good Samaritan. I prefer to call it the Parable of the Unexpected Neighbor. My preoccupation with this particular parable is shaped by the reading of the social philosopher Ivan Illich. Illich returns to this story again and again as a theme in his analysis of modern institutions. He notes our misguided efforts to provide professional solutions to problems that require, first and foremost, a neighborly community and a commitment to common conviviality.
I believe the story of the Good Samaritan has been domesticated, romanticized and distorted in meaning. I hold that in answering the question “Who is my neighbor?” one will hear from the respondent the core commitments of that person. This is a “template narrative.” It uncovers a human gestalt — points to the baseline of meaning. The answer to this question has shaped the lives of people throughout the ages, from St. Francis to Mother Teresa, from Ghandi to Thomas Merton.
Who is my neighbor? The answer suggests so much — from a compassion for the stranger, to an openness to the foreigner, and a welcoming of the alien, alternative solutions to vexing problems. It is a question that allows the responder to share ideas that might give us larger purpose and expanded hope. Yes, the theme of care for the neighbor challenges our propensity to selfishness, bigotry and violence; I believe it offers us even more, when we grasp the dimensions of how this story and its context might shape our perspectives today.
Ivan Illich was once asked, “Given what you suggest about institutions, what is the best way to make change, violent revolution or gradual reform?” Illich answered, “Neither, the best way to bring change is to give an alternative story.” (in David Cayley’s, The Rivers North of the Future).
Over the next several postings I will expand on the wonder of this parable and the power of the question asked of Jesus by the young man in Luke 10:25-37. I believe it opens us to a remarkably powerful, alternative story — maybe the most powerful alternative story available to humanity!
My plans this evening do not include watching “the debate.” There will be plenty more where these came from. I wonder what questions will be asked. Were I given just one question, it would be — WHO? WHO IS MY NEIGHBOR?